Mailing-List: contact commits-help@subversion.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: svn commit: r1667525 - /subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:40:59 -0000
To: commits@subversion.apache.org
From: julianfoad@apache.org
Message-Id: <20150318124059.7FEA7AC0163@hades.apache.org>

Author: julianfoad
Date: Wed Mar 18 12:40:59 2015
New Revision: 1667525

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1667525
Log:
* STATUS: Tweak my vote for r1666965 group (lag of first log results).

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1667525&r1=1667524&r2=1667525&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Wed Mar 18 12:40:59 2015
@@ -100,11 +100,9 @@ Other candidate changes:
      0.2 seconds.
    Votes:
      +1: rhuijben, philip
-     -0.2: julianfoad (can make a huge improvement to the user experience, but:
-                       figures given in justification are for a 1.8 server but
-                       a 1.9 server should have vastly quicker log computation;
-                       counting-based design doesn't semantically match the
-                       user's requirement which is for a limited time delay)
+     +0: julianfoad (reviewed but not tested;
+                     figures given in justification are for a 1.8 server but
+                     a 1.9 server should have vastly quicker log computation)
      +0: kotkov (change looks good and passes the tests; will update the vote
                  after trying it on a couple of real-world repositories with
                  different HTTPD setups)