subversion-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From s...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1158965 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Date Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:07:09 GMT
Author: stsp
Date: Wed Aug 17 23:07:08 2011
New Revision: 1158965

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1158965&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Add r1158963 to r1158617 group.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1158965&r1=1158964&r2=1158965&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Wed Aug 17 23:07:08 2011
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: rhuijben, hwright
 
-  * r1158617, r1158875, r1158886, r1158896, r1158919, r1158924
+  * r1158617, r1158875, r1158886, r1158896, r1158919, r1158924, r1158963
     Make 'svn revert' remove unversioned files resulting from reverting a copy.
     Fixes issue #3101.
     Justification:
@@ -156,9 +156,10 @@ Candidate changes:
       the first merge. There are various other cases where the unversioned
       files get in the way.
     Notes:
-      Instead of reviewing the individual commits I would suggest to run
-      the following merge and review the resulting diff:
-        svn merge -c1158617,1158875,1158886,1158896,1158919,1158924 \
+      All revisions depend on one another, but some amend or even undo changes
+      made in earlier revisions. Instead of reviewing the individual commits
+      I would suggest to run the following merge and review the resulting diff:
+        svn merge -c1158617,1158875,1158886,1158896,1158919,1158924,1158963 \
           ^/subversion/trunk
     Votes:
       +1: stsp (but only if this gets into 1.7.0)



Mime
View raw message