subversion-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl>
Subject RE: svn commit: r990916 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp ClientContext.h
Date Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:59:58 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: hyrum@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hyrum@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf Of
> Hyrum Wright
> Sent: maandag 30 augustus 2010 21:43
> To: Subversion Development
> Cc: commits
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r990916 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: ClientContext.cpp
> ClientContext.h
> 
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:37 PM,  <hwright@apache.org> wrote:
> > Author: hwright
> > Date: Mon Aug 30 19:37:05 2010
> > New Revision: 990916
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=990916&view=rev
> > Log:
> > JavaHL: Create a persistent C client context, in order to reuse the
> working
> > copy context between client API invocations.
> >
> > Note: This introduces a test failure which I believe to be a
> manifestation of
> > a bug in wc-ng.
> 
> For the interested, this is the test failure:

(I see a completely different test failure on the Windows bot)

Can you run this same test with single-db?

The current recursive lock code for multi-db doesn't have stable behavior
over added and removed directories, while the single-db code has. I didn't
feel like reinventing a complete lock store system like the old access
batons just to fix these issues for multi-db. (Single-db has a real
recursive lock, so it only has to delete the lock from the root)

	Bert


Mime
View raw message