struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Jodd/Madvoc MVC framework
Date Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:23:15 GMT
The async thing is nice; that would be a good thing to bring into S2.

I still don't like the string-based action returns; strings are just awful.
I don't have a better solution (yet).

It might be a good time for me to rethink the code-based config I'd
implemented some time ago, e.g., use a Groovy or whatever DSL to config the
results, that way they end up being code artifacts.


On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Christoph Nenning <
Christoph.Nenning@lex-com.net> wrote:

> > Hi folks,
> >
> > has anyone seen this before?
> > http://jodd.org/doc/madvoc/index.html
> >
> > Looks like they are taking basic Struts 2 concepts and mixing it with
> > some Spring MVC and Seam.
> >
> > It might be interesting to evaluate which of their concepts might be
> > nice to integrate in S2.5/3 - just sayin' ... :)
> >
> > - René
> >
>
>
> It is heavily centered around annotations and convention. You can feel
> that it has not "more than a decade" of history. To achieve that for
> struts it would be necessary to delete half the code base ;)
>
>
> Two things that popped to my eye:
> - you can declare actions as async and thus use asyncContext from servlet
> api 3.0
> - you can declare result type in string returned by action instead of
> configuring it up front:
> return "redirect:/<two>?value=${value}";
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
> This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus
>



-- 
e: davelnewton@gmail.com
m: 908-380-8699
s: davelnewton_skype
t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton>
b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/>
g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton>
so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message