Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF98F103F8 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 04:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12841 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2013 04:09:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 12568 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2013 04:09:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 12551 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2013 04:09:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:09:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sreekanth.nair@egovernments.org designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:09:37 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id wc20so4838757obb.14 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 21:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YUDM9opobLycRtgzp5SA8mD9XfMbUZU9Tanw0++qeZE=; b=abFur3I2kusLOn4G2vHuDGAwcBAg6qRcseJ0a1Ju03MNT1mPMxaJo04jzX1Yyf1NXM 7geaM3Hmv33Gm0lo3ZOtgdE1kEgcEItBZuV4GUSqD1oQYfioRpskkckCdc1MAuBsVlnn h8FmdA2Vrx8CTNsnzUEeATUdoH9e7n3+38idpUyX08swjmqOOKruryCCPc2Cn7e7GfLm F4ARrdqm1nquryKhfFDhRWZzl538so/LftWRpzM1sIsYaxnNdur7amlv34RJU/kWDnFm yJ9IjzyK1Q6c5cGWhd6Z50bqNdNf1cxaJfd8dvWd04O9dwX+rquJNXUCPG7r+3n9yxHI AnfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpIzpqJ4ZbAd6Cg3tpIn4u0PCfezTZJ8vhKet8gNNvKerogZB8J6HZEaZYEtvxcQUbn6Zi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.250.232 with SMTP id zf8mr4932245obc.75.1375934956472; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 21:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.44.228 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:09:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 09:39:16 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Annotation Support for bypassing prepare From: "Sreekanth S. Nair" To: Struts Users Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c45450a01504e367d2eb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0160c45450a01504e367d2eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 With all gratitude, I strongly disagree with that idea . That bring more clumsiness to big strust2 applications. And the idea of taking an array of Prepare is a good idea but don't you think it consumes a pinch of runtime performance. --089e0160c45450a01504e367d2eb--