Return-Path: 
 <user-return-211342-apmail-struts-user-archive=struts.apache.org@struts.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02B5E6C6E
	for <apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:59:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 10021 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2011 21:59:41 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9982 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2011 21:59:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@struts.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@struts.apache.org>
List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9974 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2011 21:59:41 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:59:41 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davelnewton@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-iy0-f176.google.com)
 (209.85.210.176)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:59:33 +0000
Received: by iyi20 with SMTP id 20so6339113iyi.35
        for <user@struts.apache.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=sKCx11L5KI9MY7kz5+PlJG/ZKjS2EFs6iT1vxrRKiF0=;
        b=dlju0sDHMwG1MCyn/37ceFUMVHOx+UpUZCHp99SKWJDBN/+iU4WfMsXkhc5SgT6pCE
         KXRBPT3Kfipj7Nsbh9a/H2k6RHPsJd4ZudYA4NGr/n/Dac6WeejO9lApTUsIHhMfh5b8
         rFD3isRXpiR7FfD0yzD9yt+85KZ1Dpvb2bKgA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.49.8 with SMTP id t8mr4770515ibf.27.1311112751346; Tue, 19
 Jul 2011 14:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.222.131 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E25F459.4070403@christopherschultz.net>
References: <4E0D38BF.6010005@christopherschultz.net>
	<4E25F459.4070403@christopherschultz.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:59:11 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CADJJoV4iBL4w5nP2oi=8FSo7pV0hU=ZOjWGVXxX7FhYoabnG8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [S1] Validator configuration error [bump]
From: Dave Newton <davelnewton@gmail.com>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

If it works, I wouldn't worry about it.

I'm not sure if anybody is planning any further 1.x releases, to be
honest; maybe if a patch is filed against the ticket someone would
apply it, but I'm not sure who (Paul, are you still doing S1 stuff?)

Dave

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Christopher Schultz
<chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> All,
>
> Does anyone have any ideas about my post?
>
> - -chris
>
> On 6/30/2011 11:02 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> struts-1.3.8 commons-validator-1.3.1
>>
>> I recently started using a dynamic form <form-property> attribute
>> called "reset". It's documented to allow you to use either "true" or
>> "false" or any combination of comma-separated HTTP methods that will
>> trigger the form field to be blanked-out in the form before data from
>> the request is applied to it.
>>
>> From struts-1.3.dtd:
>>
>> " <!-- The "form-property" element describes a JavaBean property that
>> can be used to configure an instance of a DynaActionForm or a
>> subclass thereof.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> reset - The flag that indicates when this property should be reset to
>> its "initial" value when the form's "reset()" method is called. If
>> this is set to "true", the property is always reset when "reset()" is
>> called. This can also be set to one or more HTTP methods, such as GET
>> or POST. In such a case, the property will be reset only when the
>> HTTP method used for the request being processed is included in this
>> attribute's value(s). Multiple HTTP methods can be specified by
>> separating them with whitespace or commas.
>>
>> [...] --> <!ELEMENT form-property =A0(set-property*)> <!ATTLIST
>> form-property =A0className =A0 =A0 =A0%ClassName; =A0 =A0 #IMPLIED> <!AT=
TLIST
>> form-property =A0initial =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0CDATA =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 #IMPLI=
ED> <!ATTLIST
>> form-property =A0name =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 %PropName; =A0 =A0 =A0#REQUIRE=
D> <!ATTLIST
>> form-property =A0reset =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0%Boolean; =A0 =A0 =A0 #IMPLIED=
> <!ATTLIST
>> form-property =A0size =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 %Integer; =A0 =A0 =A0 #IMPLIED=
> <!ATTLIST
>> form-property =A0type =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 %ClassName; =A0 =A0 #REQUIRED>
>>
>> The "reset" attribute is declared as "%Boolean;" which is:
>>
>> <!ENTITY % Boolean "(true|false|yes|no)">
>>
>> This causes the following errors during configuration:
>>
>> 2011-06-30 22:49:33,658 [main] ERROR
>> org.apache.commons.digester.Digester- Parse Error at line 18 column
>> 86: Attribute "reset" with value "POST" must have a value from the
>> list "true false yes no ". org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Attribute
>> "reset" with value "POST" must have a value from the list "true false
>> yes no ".
>>
>> I checked, and it does not look like there is an updated
>> struts-1.3.x.dtd for me to use with any fix for this.
>>
>> Oddly enough, the configuration itself seems to load and work
>> properly. Maybe Struts reports SAXParseExceptions but doesn't
>> actually stop processing? The configuration works as expected... it
>> just has this nasty configuration error whenever we start up.
>>
>> First, does anyone see a reason to worry about the error, given that
>> everything seems to actually work.
>>
>> Second, since S1 hasn't seen a release since 2008, it is even worth
>> filing a bug and getting it fixed if there isn't likely to be
>> another 1.3.x release for a while?
>>
>> Thanks, -chris
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk4l9FkACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCzIQCfYYYJrbO+9u4tjEexFZs4jAIV
> iq4AoICuGL1Heci8eqGScMCQgSiVL6TF
> =3Dp6wC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org