struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Kiley" <jhki...@summa-tech.com>
Subject Re: s2 dojo / datepicker conundrum
Date Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:05:28 GMT
If you listen closely you can hear my head explode, as of course that solves
the problem perfectly.  Thanks Dave.

jk

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Dave Newton <newton.dave@yahoo.com> wrote:

> AFAIK S2.0 would simply use the standard <s:head...> tag.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 6/3/08, Jim Kiley <jhkiley@summa-tech.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Jim Kiley <jhkiley@summa-tech.com>
> > Subject: s2 dojo / datepicker conundrum
> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2008, 11:00 AM
> > Hey gang,
> >
> > I have an app that needs a datepicker.  I initially
> > inserted an
> > <s:datepicker> into my app.  But I see from reviewing
> > the docs that
> > s:datepicker needs <sx:head> to be around in order to
> > work right.  And of
> > course sx:head requires the struts-dojo-tags taglib.  And
> > the dojo plugin
> > isn't available as part of the distribution until 2.1.
> >
> > Does this mean I shouldn't bother using the datepicker
> > until 2.1 is GA?  If
> > that's true, why is s:datepicker even available as a
> > tag in 2.0.x?  If
> > that's false, what am I missing?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jim Kiley
> > Technical Consultant | Summa
> > [p] 412.258.3346 [m] 412.445.1729
> > http://www.summa-tech.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Jim Kiley
Technical Consultant | Summa
[p] 412.258.3346 [m] 412.445.1729
http://www.summa-tech.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message