Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30444 invoked from network); 23 May 2008 11:38:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2008 11:38:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 99963 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2008 11:37:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 99935 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2008 11:37:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 99924 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2008 11:37:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 May 2008 04:37:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:37:10 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JzVaP-0002F4-OS for user@struts.apache.org; Fri, 23 May 2008 04:37:25 -0700 Message-ID: <17423821.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 04:37:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Kirti To: user@struts.apache.org Subject: struts + freemarker version MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: kirtiteja@gmail.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org we are currently using struts 2.0.9 with freemarker 2.3.8. We are planning to upgrade to struts 2.0.11 and freemarker 2.3.13. But we have few doubts on thier compatibility. Apparently struts 2.0.11 also uses freemarker 2.3.8. We see that there are major performance improvements in 2.3.13. Can we upgrade ourselves to use struts 2.0.11 with freemarker 2.3.13? Do anyone see any issues with this upgradation? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/struts-%2B-freemarker-version-tp17423821p17423821.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org