struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ted Husted" <hus...@apache.org>
Subject Re: struts 2.1 beta
Date Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:52:41 GMT
If it does, please feel free to file a issue ticket against 2.1.0.

 * https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW/fixforversion/21794

-Ted.

On 10/4/07, meissa.sakho@investorservicing.natixis.fr
<meissa.sakho@investorservicing.natixis.fr> wrote:
>
> We did all of the things described in the performance-tuning tips.
> But we've been using intensively ajax tag (datetime picker and
> autocompleter).
> Theses two tags force us to include the killing head tag.
> When we removed them (removing the head tag in the same time) our pages
> are faster (a least 5 times).
>
> I think that if the head tag will still kill performance on 2.1. It should
> be told in the performance tip.
>
> It will surely help posting a link to a temporary struts 2.1 version.
>
> thank in advance.
> Meissa
>
>
>
>
> "Ted Husted" <husted@apache.org>
> Envoyé par : ted.husted@gmail.com
> 04/10/2007 13:08
> Veuillez répondre à
> "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
>
>
> A
> "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
> cc
>
> Objet
> Re: struts 2.1 beta
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For performance problems, be sure to follow the advice on this page.
>
>  * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/performance-tuning.html
>
> If you do all of these things, and still consider the performance
> unacceptable, then I doubt that Struts 2.1 will make a startling
> difference. If performance is the key concern, then Struts 1 is still
> the best choice. I also understand that Tapestry performs well.
>
> If it helps, I'll post a link to a temporary Struts 2.1 snapshot, with
> all the dependencies, on the developers list. As soon as XWork 2.1.0
> is available, we'll roll a Struts 2.1.0 distribution for testing,
> which should be "real soon now".
>
>  * http://www.nabble.com/Struts---Dev-f205.html
>
> -- HTH, Ted
> Attend "Migrating to Ajax" at ApacheCon US 2007:
>  * http://us.apachecon.com/us2007/program/talk/1883
>
>
> On 9/25/07, meissa.sakho@investorservicing.natixis.fr
> <meissa.sakho@investorservicing.natixis.fr> wrote:
> >
> > That's exactly what I wanted. I new complete un-released version.
> > But at this time, I'm giving up. To tired.
> > I'll restart using struts when a version without the dreadfull
> performance
> > impact will be around.
> >
> > I hope that we'll get it before the end of the century.
> >
> > Meissa
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dave Newton <newton.dave@yahoo.com>
> > 25/09/2007 14:56
> > Veuillez répondre à
> > "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
> >
> >
> > A
> > Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
> > cc
> >
> > Objet
> > Re: struts 2.1 beta
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If you want a complete build of an un-released version
> > then AFAIK you need to build it from source. The
> > repository contains the dependent libraries.
> >
> > The nightly builds are just that, builds, not
> > distributions (again, AFAIK).
> >
> > --- meissa.sakho@investorservicing.natixis.fr wrote:
> > > I just need to grab the nightly version WITH
> > > DEPENDANTS LIBRAIRIES if it exist.
> > > the link below
> > >
> >
> http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/building-the-framework-from-source.html
> > > drive me to that one
> > >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/nightlies/2.x/
> > >
> > > No librairies.
> > > Meissa
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dave Newton <newton.dave@yahoo.com>
> > > 25/09/2007 14:28
> > > Veuillez répondre à
> > > "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> > > A
> > > Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Objet
> > > Re: struts 2.1 beta
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Oleg Mikheev <mihel@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> > > > Dave Newton wrote:
> > > > >> I have just renamed it to struts2-core.jar and
> > > > >> replaced in my application that was working
> > > with
> > > > >> 2.0.9 version.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can't just randomly replace libraries.
> > > >
> > > > You can replace 2.0.8 with 2.0.9, but you can't
> > > > replace 2.0.9 with 2.1.0
> > >
> > > You certainly *could*, but it would still make me
> > > nervous w/o testing since XWork revved also... I
> > > guess
> > > I always think that dropping in a new library
> > > revision
> > > w/o keeping track of library dependencies is risky.
> > >
> > > d.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > user-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > L'integrite de ce message n'etant pas assuree sur
> > > internet, Natixis ne peut etre tenu responsable de
> > > son contenu. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non
> > > autorisee est interdite. Si vous n'etes pas
> > > destinataire de ce message, merci de le detruire et
> > > d'avertir l'expediteur.
> > > Ensemble, faisons un geste pour l'environnement :
> > > n'imprimons nos mails que si necessaire
> > >
> > > The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed
> > > on the Internet. Natixis can not therefore be
> > > considered responsible for the contents. Any
> > > unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If
> > > you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> > > then please delete it and notify the sender.
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > L'integrite de ce message n'etant pas assuree sur internet, Natixis ne
> peut etre tenu responsable de son contenu. Toute utilisation ou diffusion
> non autorisee est interdite. Si vous n'etes pas destinataire de ce
> message, merci de le detruire et d'avertir l'expediteur.
> > Ensemble, faisons un geste pour l'environnement : n'imprimons nos mails
> que si necessaire
> >
> > The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet.
> Natixis can not therefore be considered responsible for the contents. Any
> unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this message, then please delete it and notify the
> sender.
> >
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> L'integrite de ce message n'etant pas assuree sur internet, Natixis ne peut etre tenu
responsable de son contenu. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est interdite. Si
vous n'etes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le detruire et d'avertir l'expediteur.
> Ensemble, faisons un geste pour l'environnement : n'imprimons nos mails que si necessaire
>
> The integrity of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet. Natixis can not therefore
be considered responsible for the contents. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message, then please delete it and notify the
sender.
>


-- 
HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message