Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96407 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2007 16:58:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2007 16:58:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 92133 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 16:58:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 92117 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2007 16:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 92106 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2007 16:58:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 09:58:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [199.198.220.60] (HELO cibc.ca) (199.198.220.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:58:41 +0000 Received: from ([159.231.7.20]) by cbmcc-si-im3.cibc.ca with ESMTP id 5502374.30095756; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:58:01 -0400 Received: from CBSCC-X3-MBVS01.ad.cibc.com ([159.231.1.11]) by cbmcc-x3-smtp01.ad.cibc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:58:01 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: struts1 or struts 2? Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:58:00 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8b3ce3790708080927w67ff5d4cp35c3ce4967d8ee5@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: struts1 or struts 2? thread-index: AcfZ2RLRSPjkqkb7TMiyRuDd49G3PgABANFw From: "Asthana, Rahul" To: "Struts Users Mailing List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2007 16:58:01.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[47749150:01C7D9DD] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ted/Frank, Is there a more detailed post/article that you have done regarding this = architecture? Thanks Rahul -----Original Message----- From: ted.husted@gmail.com [mailto:ted.husted@gmail.com]On Behalf Of Ted Husted Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:27 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: struts1 or struts 2? On 8/7/07, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > Then again, if I *really* had my druthers, I'd use DWR for everything = on > the back-end and pick best-of-breed widgets on the UI to construct my = own > client-side framework... the last project I did more or less did this, > although we used S1 and not DWR, but it worked out tremendously well, = so > in my mind the approach is more than sound, it's close to ideal... > standard enough that a decent developer can get up to speed quick, but > custom enough to fit the problem domain like a glove. +1 My team did our last project using the same sort of architecture, but since the backend was on .NET, we used Jayrock instead of DWR. Works great, and it also seems like the ideal mix to me. We had to roll our own solution for the server-side validation and type conversion, but we based that work on a chain of command, and it's layered so we can reuse it with multiple front end applications. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org