Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69195 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2007 00:13:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2007 00:13:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 32569 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2007 00:13:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 32548 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2007 00:13:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 32537 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2007 00:13:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:13:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [88.198.241.90] (HELO web.cuetech.de) (88.198.241.90) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:12:55 -0700 Received: from [10.0.0.20] (p54982D42.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.152.45.66]) by web.cuetech.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5033B3C01490E for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:12:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Piero Sartini To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Subject: Re: sub-struts Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 02:12:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200704080143.31399.lists@pierosartini.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704080212.33405.lists@pierosartini.de> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sunday 08 April 2007 02:01:24 Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote: > I forgot to say that the directory structure i wrote on my first post > (which was wrong [forgot the web-inf directory]), should be inside a > directory of the application. So each widget should have it's own > "classes" directory, struts.xml, etc. > > The directory nesting is not necessary, but the widgets will work as > children to the main application will be nested so it makes more sense > to me. > > The objective is to have struts within struts. Yes, I did understand that. Just did not understand why you would want that and tried to show other solutions that may solve your needs :-) If you really want to make several struts2 applications and "compose" them somehow, you could use sitemesh to do so. But I think configuring and developing several stand-alone webapps is much more work than developing everything within one s2 application. Piero --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org