Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74414 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2007 16:20:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2007 16:20:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 95061 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2007 16:20:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 95027 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2007 16:20:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 95016 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2007 16:20:48 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_FOR_ONLY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of musachy@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:37 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id q29so251895nfc for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Gz/OTdZXY7JFk9gcbH3/gL5rJ6QggGvrZZGUvm7r4ggpJDmVJBBL5gpHwzqnqUskWuWc0w7byU7+8rKiFetsSOc6z7z1cwo/Gusl3b2bxkDL1Qn46ORZdMCRvd7KU1NWMEbuZPEHUsrKI93BL2mISd9jH9pTQvCi5GY6I3T+OVA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=einPQkum0m4f31grZ0VVR87fGSLHlE/rNduDMa2FwefzorPiXyp1BYTg5vDBqtxTjQcE5Pl1NbypZz/PlCzsJkgN0AmkpR5qvN5Q1twXUxgRMtlM5J5IuDuAtN8q59n2jK2LXBpyeRRq4jfZPPzBAZXRWtF2wIjxjzgEvhFhLeA= Received: by 10.82.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr14184331buf.1172074814954; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.158.16 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:20:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:20:14 -0500 From: "Musachy Barroso" To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Subject: Re: [S2] struts2 validation for only one method in action In-Reply-To: <9083597.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6501_4905118.1172074814821" References: <9082687.post@talk.nabble.com> <9083597.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_6501_4905118.1172074814821 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline See here: http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/validation.html you can add a file ActionName-MethodName-validation.xml with the validation for that method. regards musachy On 2/21/07, cilquirm wrote: > > > I believe you can use validation annotation to specify validation routines > at > the method level. > > > > > ros wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > How to configure struts2 validation for only one method in action? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/struts2-validation-for-only-one-method-in-action-tf3267302.html#a9083597 > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd ------=_Part_6501_4905118.1172074814821--