Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44112 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2007 06:30:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2007 06:30:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 96449 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2007 06:30:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 96420 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2007 06:30:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 96409 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2007 06:30:20 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:30:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of zhengshuai1979@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.191] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:30:09 -0800 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so1222849mue for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:29:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=LlUxMyPzsxzr4oQQeBawd+X2JGpCrnCmzp2fSwwfA0QRwaSkVm6G80/9S+1m3cDDfnFd419yoe+q0pOASEHQu1gQIgUIPKMevaXp7Pa+p9MWzI4qCRmVw1DEHgFIFwsQaIJlI/jcbOeMAfjEtUh3FPH5UPEu/qB/PL3gLKDEmp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=IaeJ6Icr1vFHd0KJ+2kE1ERAddde6C5JcgxtNev6yRQSlid7wWmOazBWyG0YPn4jNefg7K0R12jQw4N+477C41+i+X+N5YEK890vlpASeCuUMCaFN5H3g6LGqg6e94JLGdi+bqpOGBEkdkqmnvSBbbyujt263T/zksCY5y3lmH4= Received: by 10.82.177.3 with SMTP id z3mr1493545bue.1172471387668; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:29:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.188.6 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:29:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <391ea6730702252229s77c66b21h3227a0e15d90af83@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:29:47 +0800 From: "Shuai Zheng" To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Subject: The performance issue about OGNL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_38294_19147080.1172471387641" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_38294_19147080.1172471387641 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Dear All, I am using struts 2.0.6, but honestly the performance is very bad (not need to think about scalability), to speed to load a simple page is much slower than pure JSP (I haven't compared with struts 1). To refresh one page it is 3-5 seconds with only one user. The profiler tells me the OGNL is the bottleneck. I notice that there are some complains on OGNL about the performance already, may I know any other way to replace OGNL with anything else to get a faster speed? Currently the speed is not acceptable for production. Regards, Zheng Shuai ------=_Part_38294_19147080.1172471387641--