Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90686 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2007 22:11:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2007 22:11:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 39558 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2007 22:11:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 39526 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2007 22:11:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 39515 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2007 22:11:10 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:11:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ted.husted@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.233 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.233] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.233) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:11:01 -0800 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so295850nzi for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=L3YRoxSo/e3YMYGlt2LfJGY0UsvwtKa73a6y8YbXO8MmVsypwHLTzwuBqbuJ/DFpudTOk5xqT32bPVQF6CdUHlTt7DZtNRFp8RsvRf7Kf7P6s12ZSWluFJiNZuLoSvi4NDABAb2kGX+cstnm5k9JhVGNFUXCIojSsnW3rzK4cFo= Received: by 10.64.143.12 with SMTP id q12mr2243816qbd.1170281435678; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.103.6 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:10:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8b3ce3790701311410w1deeb93fwba982674369a3773@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:10:22 -0500 From: "Ted Husted" Sender: ted.husted@gmail.com To: "Struts Users Mailing List" , tomfrost@excite.com Subject: Re: [s2] versions? In-Reply-To: <20070131031446.9CBB98B34D@xprdmxin.myway.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070131031446.9CBB98B34D@xprdmxin.myway.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 13181ead0ee0c197 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, far Struts 2.0.1 is the only milestone to be deemed at least a beta, and announced to the user list. There have been several other milestones, but we did not promote them to beta, for one reason or another. We're reviewing Struts 2.0.4 now, and it looks like it will be tagged at least a beta for now. We would then announce it to the user list, to encourage wider testing. Based on that experience, we would then decide whether to mark the release ready for "General Availability" (our best grade). The underlying notion is that we create the milestone first, and then decide on its quality. Depending on actual experience, we will upgrade (or downgrade) the quality of a milestone release. -Ted. On 1/30/07, bob wrote: > > At first I thought there was only a 2.0.1 version of struts2, as its the only one listed >"upfront"; now I've found 2.0.2 . . . 2.0.5. I'm not really familiar with official versioning >practices, so maybe this is obvious, but what are the differences? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org