Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13186 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 17:28:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2006 17:28:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 55421 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2006 17:28:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 55395 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2006 17:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 55384 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2006 17:28:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:28:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [205.216.250.5] (HELO osse2.pingsite.com) (205.216.250.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:28:13 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (firebox.pingsite.com [205.216.250.2]) by osse2.pingsite.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k49FHA909963 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 11:17:10 -0400 Message-ID: <4460D117.9030101@pingsite.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 13:27:51 -0400 From: Dave Newton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Make base Action class a dispatch action References: <1db115340605041053l580dee91oa54c7d753f7155dd@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850605090315v6ff0be12va3505e9b89c153bf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55afdc850605090315v6ff0be12va3505e9b89c153bf@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Niall Pemberton wrote: > Personally I'm against this because IMO it just adds > confusion/complexity to the Action class that is unnecessary for users > who don't want to use the "dispatch" style. Not if you use my idea of making the 'execute' method the default dispatch. Of course, don't name one of your params 'execute' ;) Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org