Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <42826313.7020104@cyberspaceroad.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:54:59 +0100
From: Adam Hardy <ahardy.struts@cyberspaceroad.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB;
 rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Debian/1.7.5-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Is struts more performant than JSF
References: <32FF68568B05944AAB124A04F3C14A1F08C667E6@sxchs008b.itzrh.ska.com>
 <b20f9568732526798afa934e252d6c68@raibledesigns.com>
In-Reply-To: <b20f9568732526798afa934e252d6c68@raibledesigns.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/05/05 00:15&nbsp;Matt Raible wrote:
> You could hammer on AppFuse and Equinox - they both have Struts and JSF 
> versions.
> 
> http://demo.appfuse.org/appfuse (Struts 1.2.4)
> http://demo.appfuse.org/appfuse-jsf (MyFaces 1.0.7)
> 
> http://demo.raibledesigns.com/equinox-struts (same versions as above)
> http://demo.raibledesigns.com/equinox-jsf
> 
> I haven't seen any performance differences in my experience - but I also 
> haven't stress tested either of these applications under super-heavy 
> load.  I also haven't had any out-of-memory issues when using them in 
> production - so they should make good test cases.

It would also be very interesting to read comparative analysis of the 
two apps from the development point of view - speed of development, 
complexity, extensibility, manageability etc.


Adam

-- 
struts 1.2 + tomcat 5.0.19 + java 1.4.2
Linux 2.4.20 Debian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org