On Feb 01, 2005, at 21:16, Larry Meadors wrote:
> HAHAHAH! I just inherited some code with a pile of inner classes, and
> I have to say I agree with you on that "sorry freak of nature"
> comment. Still not sure I dig static ICs, but am willing to give them
> the benefit of the doubt...for now.
Static inner class is perhaps a misnomer, as they get tainted by
associations with their degenerated cousins, the "inners".
In a nutshell, static don't share anything with their enclosing class
except being in the same source file. Think of them more in terms of
"packaging" then "semantic".
Cheers
--
PA, Onnay Equitursay
http://alt.textdrive.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
|