Return-Path: 
 <user-return-128686-apmail-struts-user-archive=struts.apache.org@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64460 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2004 05:25:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Dec 2004 05:25:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 42994 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2004 05:24:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-struts-user-archive@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42929 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2004 05:24:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:user-subscribe@struts.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@struts.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@struts.apache.org>
List-Id: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user.struts.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list user@struts.apache.org
Received: (qmail 42868 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2004 05:24:57 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of
 andrew.david.hill@gridnode.com designates 202.83.97.26 as permitted sender)
Received: from s-97-26.dsl.cleardatavoice.com (HELO gridnode.com)
 (202.83.97.26)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:24:54 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.213.69])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by gridnode.com (8.12.9/8.12.4) with ESMTP id iBU3V0GQ027562
	for <user@struts.apache.org>; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:31:00 +0800
Message-ID: <41D37650.3020805@gridnode.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 11:30:24 +0800
From: Andrew Hill <andrew.david.hill@gridnode.com>
Reply-To: andrew.david.hill@gridnode.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Which methodology is better?
References: 
 <AF306EA783C4F74C9954C396CD313E9780BDE7@sssc-mail-2.internal.sssc.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <AF306EA783C4F74C9954C396CD313E9780BDE7@sssc-mail-2.internal.sssc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

<snip>
Avoid Javascript the way a politician avoids a lie detector
</snip>

bit redundant mate - you can already tell they're lying because their 
lips move... no detector required ;-)

Jim Barrows wrote:
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Manisha Sathe [mailto:manisha_msathe@yahoo.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:44 AM
>>To: user@struts.apache.org
>>Subject: Which methodology is better?
>>
>>
>>I am very used to HTML/JavaScript. Normally i do all 
>>validations on clientside through JavaScript.
>> 
>>i just started Struts framework and i understand that 
>>"DynaActionForm" is to have validation on cliend side. (till 
>>now using ActionForm only).
>> 
>>Normally what is the practice ? Which way is better ?
> 
> 
> Don't ever trust the client side.  I can cobble up a web page with no validation and submit it to your site faster then you can say PeterPiperPickedAPeckOfPickledPeppers 5 times fast.
> In general, leave nothing on the web page unless you absolutely have to.  Avoid Javascript the way a politician avoids a lie detector.  It will save you a lot of heartache in the long run.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org