Mailing-List: contact user-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a0602043cbc91b8c6116f@[192.168.0.3]>
In-Reply-To: <406B9381.8010907@netscape.net>
References: <406B9381.8010907@netscape.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 06:20:30 -0600
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org>,
   struts-user@jakarta.apache.org
From: Joe Germuska <Joe@Germuska.com>
Subject: Re: Using Struts with Avalon
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

At 8:58 PM -0700 3/31/04, Richard Megginson wrote:
>I'd like to use Avalon for the lifecycle management of Struts Action and
>ActionForm objects.  But it seems that in order to do so, the
>RequestProcessor class would need to be replaced, or at least the
>processActionForm() and processActionCreate() methods, in order to
>perform the lifecycle management upon object creation.  Is this
>desirable?  I think I would only be using the LogEnabled and Serviceable
>interfaces for these objects - to get the correct log to use and to be
>able to use services from my Actions and ActionForms.

This is purely hearsay, but have you seen Keel?   http://keelframework.org/

About all I know is that it's based on Avalon, and they namecheck Struts.

I wouldn't mind hearing more about it from someone who's used it, or 
at least evaluated it.

Joe

-- 
Joe Germuska            
Joe@Germuska.com  
http://blog.germuska.com    
       "Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them 
the usual way.  This happens to us all the time with computers, and 
nobody thinks of complaining."
             -- Jef Raskin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org