struts-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Graham" <dgraham1...@hotmail.com>
Subject Re: [OT] Memory Footprint of DynaX vs. BO
Date Fri, 01 Nov 2002 05:04:23 GMT
I would guess that dyna beans use a bit more memory because maps use key 
value pairs (assuming they use maps).  You won't notice this difference in 
your application.  If you're worried, just run a quick test.

David






>From: "Jacob Hookom" <hookomjj@uwec.edu>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <struts-user@jakarta.apache.org>
>To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <struts-user@jakarta.apache.org>
>Subject: [OT] Memory Footprint of DynaX vs. BO
>Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:51:32 -0600
>
>By implementation, I'm assuming that DynaX uses an underlying Map to store 
>properties.  I'm wondering how using a Map to store attribute data differs 
>from storing the same data in BO's along the lines of memory consumption?
>
>Regards,
>Jacob Hookom


_________________________________________________________________
Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message