Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC422200C7E for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 12:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DB0E9160BC7; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E175160BA5 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 12:11:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 86413 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2017 10:11:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@struts.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 86162 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2017 10:11:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2017 10:11:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 53B9BC03CA for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:11:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ncbGtXyid6kP for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 65A085FAF9 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 07657E0D19 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B38D521DF5 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 10:11:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lukasz Lenart (JIRA)" To: issues@struts.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (WW-4793) Don't add JBossFileManager as a possible FileManager when not on JBoss MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 08 May 2017 10:11:09 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16000551#comment-16000551 ] Lukasz Lenart commented on WW-4793: ----------------------------------- I have marked this issue to be resolved with 2.5.x but when you agree with my comment above, this should be moved to 2.6 > Don't add JBossFileManager as a possible FileManager when not on JBoss > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WW-4793 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4793 > Project: Struts 2 > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 2.5.10 > Reporter: Stefaan Dutry > Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 2.5.next > > > When the application starts and there is no FileManager specified as initParam, the {{JBossFileManager}} gets added. > This results in the check happening everytime a FileManager is requested. > (When turning on logging, i can see it happening 12 times when starting a simple application) > {code:java|title=org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.Dispatcher} > ... > private void init_FileManager() throws ClassNotFoundException { > if (initParams.containsKey(StrutsConstants.STRUTS_FILE_MANAGER)) { > ... > } else { > // add any other Struts 2 provided implementations of FileManager > configurationManager.addContainerProvider(new FileManagerProvider(JBossFileManager.class, "jboss")); > } > ... > } > ... > {code} > {code:java|title=com.opensymphony.xwork2.util.fs.DefaultFileManagerFactory} > private FileManager lookupFileManager() { > Set names = container.getInstanceNames(FileManager.class); > ... > for (FileManager fm : internals) { > if (fm.support()) { > return fm; > } > } > return null; > } > {code} > My suggestion would be to not add it if it's not supported. > I don't know what the best way to do this would be. > The possibility i was thinking of so far involves the following: > * Creating a seperate utility class to check if it can support it > ** perhaps a public static innerclass of {{JBossFileManager}} with public static method(s) to check it? > ** or a seperate class (although i think this might be awkward) > * adding a test around adding the JBossFileManager to only do it when it could be supported. > additional information: > * log messages were noticed by adjusting the log4j2 configuration in the {{form-processing}} application from {{struts-examples}} and starting it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)