Mailing-List: contact issues-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@struts.apache.org
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 04:55:00 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Lukasz Lenart (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@struts.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12762885.1419006498000.97938.1431492900286@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12762885.1419006498000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12762885.1419006498000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12762885.1419006498234@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (WW-4437) Bug in CookieInterceptor
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541322#comment-14541322 ] 

Lukasz Lenart commented on WW-4437:
-----------------------------------

You should throw it away, FM was upgrade to the latest available version 2.3.24, see WW-4484 and it's set to be backward compatible
http://struts.apache.org/docs/freemarker.html#FreeMarker-IncompatibleImprovements


> Bug in CookieInterceptor
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: WW-4437
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4437
>             Project: Struts 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Interceptors
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.20
>            Reporter: Chris Pratt
>            Assignee: Lukasz Lenart
>             Fix For: 2.3.24
>
>
> Sorry, I don't have an environment set up to create a patch, but I found an error in the {{CookieInterceptor.isAccepted()}} method.  It currently looks like:
> {code:java}
> /**
>  * Checks if name of Cookie match {@link #acceptedPattern}
>  *
>  * @param name of Cookie
>  * @return true|false
>  */
> protected boolean isAccepted(String name) {
>     boolean matches = acceptedPattern.matcher(name).matches();
>     if (matches) {
>         if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
>             LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] matches acceptedPattern [#1]", name, ACCEPTED_PATTERN);
>         }
>     } else {
>         if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
>             LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] doesn't match acceptedPattern [#1]", name, ACCEPTED_PATTERN);
>         }
>     }
>     return matches;
> }
> {code}
> But it would be more useful if it actually reported the RegEx being used instead of the default.  And, it would be more performant if the comparisons were reversed.  So something more like:
> {code:java}
> /**
>  * Checks if name of Cookie match {@link #acceptedPattern}
>  *
>  * @param name of Cookie
>  * @return true|false
>  */
> protected boolean isAccepted (String name) {
>   boolean matches = acceptedPattern.matcher(name).matches();
>   if(LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {   
>     if(matches) {
>       LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] matches acceptedPattern [#1]",name,acceptedPattern.pattern());
>     } else {
>       LOG.trace("Cookie [#0] doesn't match acceptedPattern [#1]",name,acceptedPattern.pattern());
>     }
>   }
>   return matches;
> }
> {code}
> In addition, it looks like the default and the override are handled differently.  The current code compiles the default case-insensitive, but not the override pattern.  Shouldn't that be consistent?
> {code:java}
> private Pattern acceptedPattern = Pattern.compile(ACCEPTED_PATTERN,Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE);
> public void setAcceptCookieNames (String pattern) {
>   acceptedPattern = Pattern.compile(pattern);
> }
> {code}


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)