Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2156317EEE for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 07:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17623 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2015 07:36:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 17582 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2015 07:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 17570 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2015 07:36:48 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 07:36:48 +0000 Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com (mail-qc0-f173.google.com [209.85.216.173]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 641581A0655 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 07:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcbhb1 with SMTP id hb1so24394718qcb.1 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 00:36:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.33.24 with SMTP id h24mr13193214qkh.95.1432885007406; Fri, 29 May 2015 00:36:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.96.166.134 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 00:36:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lukasz Lenart Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 09:36:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Log42j To: Struts Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2015-05-29 8:59 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert : > I would not say that this change is to big for this release. > I mean we drop 4 plugins and change to JDK7. > So adding a new dependency is not such a big change. > And with log4j2 the users can simply add a bridge. > So the migration path is not so hard and requires no code changes. Do I get it right that plugins which use the old logging facade will work without issue? And by default, even for old code, everything will be routed to Log4j2? Regards --=20 =C5=81ukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org