Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6E085BC1-A0DE-4A15-BE77-F2D7D8BBDCBC@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMopvkMR5cnBraopF==OzF++9ApTKEW8e_HDnxk6B0h6F-tc+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPsZHKONmOG8r0XVwK-BBM8n0xDKtgOo=2hHOHn4Ht0XaHgQXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <6E085BC1-A0DE-4A15-BE77-F2D7D8BBDCBC@gmail.com>
From: Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlenart@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:20:32 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAMopvkPeAyfw8R6aXz3qzPS9trGck=Wg8rt-dGv5B98vUkr9jA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Strutsathon - Warsjawa
To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2013/10/12 Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com>:
>>> - Guice 3 instead internal DI
>>
>> That would definitely be a major improvement - so +1 for this.
>
> Actually I am not so sure any longer on this one. I mean, what are the re=
al
> benefits of having Google Guice instead of what we have now?
> I think this should be clarified that.

You are right, but it was one of the topics to select from - and two
guys decided to give it a try ;-) I'm not saying it is important but I
have used it as a catch for new contributors ;-)

>> How about an MVEL implementation of the ValueStack? ;-)
>
> This I consider more important. In general everything related to security

No one chose that and it's hard for people to solve security problems IMHO =
;-)


Regards
--=20
=C5=81ukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org