struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Benitez <steven.beni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Security judges
Date Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:30:51 GMT
Yeah, I'm not a fan of the Judge name either. Guard is better, but I'm not
sure if it's best. What would the API look like?

On Thursday, October 10, 2013, Lukasz Lenart wrote:

> 2013/10/10 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlenart@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
> > 2013/10/10 Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org <javascript:;>>:
> >> I like the idea except the Judge name. I think Authenticator is fine.
> >
> > Hm... basically what the interfaces do is to judge if e.g. action name
> > is proper, parameter name matches given pattern, etc. It's some kind
> > of authentication of request but rather in validation terms (I don't
> > want to have another set of validators ;-)) Also users can have false
> > fillings that Struts provides some built-in authentication mechanism
> > (search phrase: struts authentication can point them to that logic).
> >
> > That's why SecurityJudge :-)
>
> Or SecurityGuard :-)
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Ɓukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org <javascript:;>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message