Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F405EFB3 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18388 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2013 19:13:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 18295 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2013 19:13:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 18285 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2013 19:13:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:13:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paulus.benedictus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-ob0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:13:03 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id v19so1590356obq.35 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:12:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DeKbKcqyKtfuyk4bzi+crUQLRRyKsDYZmqMaHTNFxwY=; b=I5NcecG5tNtdjJ0iURtZ0PlRs1/yyvTgw2dCe1pvHoUY3cTtg5+oPKvSLOemASWB3p bBdz6Jli7xtB7vwh4bHee61k/DPDyFeWdSekMD1uxa5Ww3VYW6A0nlyn1U5MX1vIaQFa iYquqf9ppIU9ZQNV5T1VGCHTjdUKUki5oZr0nbVFzrp6swZzmNyFsWyLmYhkjZo0KFIo FH5vCQV+LwtTsS/N4x4x0rYTxPqjcSuvRu2YPV9yfuDGKm12yqYsGlxIe6Q0Pelb/fPZ 8C1tP9WZOgV8hL2yEjubmCS3oN2oG2yZSTxWAWN5xrvGv2dCirv+BgeQV4yP1tA/ynXR WRAQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.190.19 with SMTP id gm19mr7481228obc.34.1359227561683; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:12:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: paulus.benedictus@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.171.168 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:12:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.171.168 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:12:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:12:41 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BodCnFNdtHKnzSCj7GtjztLzKyw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Removing old versions From: Paul Benedict To: Struts Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04448083fbac4604d435d3f0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04448083fbac4604d435d3f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good idea. On Jan 26, 2013 12:57 PM, "Lukasz Lenart" wrote: > What about moving all the releases under /release and add redirects to > keep the old structure? Eg.: > > /1.3.10 -> redirect -> /release/1.3.10 > /2.3.8 -> redirect -> /release/2.3.8 > > We'll have just one unmanaged directory in extpaths.txt -> release > > > Regards > -- > =C5=81ukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > 2013/1/22 Lukasz Lenart : > > 2013/1/22 Paul Benedict : > >> No objects. While I personally prefer 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, I won't stand in > the > >> way of your choices. :-) > > > > Opinions of others are always important :-) > > > > I thought about the same but it looks a bit strange to me: > > /1.x/1.3.10/ > > /2.x/2.2.1.1/ > > > > but the same as these: > > /1/1.3.10/ > > /2/2.2.1.1/ > > > > looks like the current is the best :-) > > > > > > Regards > > -- > > =C5=81ukasz > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org > > --f46d04448083fbac4604d435d3f0--