Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89442E2C9 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 09:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95372 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 09:35:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 94175 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2012 09:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 94106 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2012 09:35:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:35:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of grobmeier@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-ob0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:35:01 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id un3so2547138obb.35 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 01:34:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nhixOhCOF+/ZWvInUQx1ASnmUysB/ynfcmZeethz5z8=; b=IWbwwrRuwPbrUdC/QmDycmJ3eTGeSyaldZ04/sk2rdbvFudeh49ksv1CLxye/lYfEs VWXOvgv8f5EZsIJrUYzgb9RPr4qOe3mW7kLDqH5mmmQmdyX0nlsfQ0Xi23zyYovoZblx E7XyEhZToGNbIDQ7W6+/uf49za2wvcJkqPn4CuZr0TchkcBkFoSVJ2HdrozDAMQPX/q/ LimSoLfMaIF8qsfEfUdXLfuN1+rS6vGYl6P4TgW3Bju6bY/XC/FbabSDn8pSZt/JUFC/ 7f3POd2e3fHSacZFh5ok5cABh2t3i4xQrX/fUwnykEWmRQJMQHnJtkCgFiWW5Nnbu4DP zuQQ== Received: by 10.60.170.177 with SMTP id an17mr7897105oec.39.1354527280444; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 01:34:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.76.230 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 01:34:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50B4F5DF.7080601@apache.org> <50B5C289.8020604@apache.org> From: Christian Grobmeier Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 10:34:20 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using fluido once available To: Struts Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Martin Cooper wrote: >> We have an "official" Twitter account - @TheApacheStruts - which we use >> to spread news about Struts and to interact with our community. Just >> like @TheASF, @TheApacheTomcat or @ApacheJames. >> >> On Facebook, there is as well a page voluntarily maintained by Struts >> PMC members, called "Struts2 Users. Objective: spreading and dispatching >> news, interacting with the community. Currently 1400+ "likes" aka >> followers. See: >> https://www.facebook.com/apachestruts >> >> On G+, there is again an page voluntarily maintained by Struts PMC >> members, called "Apache Struts". Objective: spreading and dispatching >> news, interacting with the community. Currently more than 3700 people >> are following. See: >> https://plus.google.com/+ApacheStruts/posts >> See also on G+: "Apache Software Foundation", "Apache TomEE" >> >> The idea is to link this pages to our site just like we did with the >> twitter account in the branch (and other Apache projects do as well on >> their front page). >> >> So how is this "supporting commercial enterprises"? One could argue that >> we are using (free) services of commercial companies, yes. We do that >> all the time at Apache. I fail to see how this is promoting Twitter, >> Google or Facebook as companies. > > > If 100 other companies came along and asked us to put links to their site= s > on our site, would we do it? If not, why not? Would we be selective, or a= dd > anyone who asked? If the former, what are the criteria? Why isn't LinkedI= n > in the same group as the "special three" we've chosen to advertise? Because we are free to chose our tools. If volunteers he want to maintain FB, G+ and Twitter and link to the accounts there, it is fine. It is a service to our users, because they can read news in the tools of their choice. If the project choses LinkedIn as another tool, we should link it as well. Criteria is: does the PMC want to use the tool? Yes -> link. No -> no link. Similar to maven: we use maven because we like it. If the Gradle team would ask us to support Gradle, what would we say? >> Ironically, the latter two are getting >> prominent ASF support since they are platinum sponsors: >> http://apache.org/foundation/thanks.html > > Sponsorship does *not* buy favours. That's very explicit. And that is als= o > why there is a specific, foundation-central, and non-project-specific > "thank you" page. I don't see what "Sponsorship" has something to do with our toolset. >> Linking to Struts related resources on Twitter, G+ or Facebook is as >> much of a support for commercial enterprises as linking to Struts >> Sourceforge is or Struts GitHub would be - free community resources >> offered and hosted free of charge by a commercial enterprise like >> SourceForge and GitHub. >> > > Once we've checked with our legal people, and this usage has been approve= d > by them, I'll be fine with it. Until then, I'm very conscious that the AS= F > is legally a charity, and is subject to losing that status if we don't > abide by the rules. So I would rather ask the question and get the offici= al > answer than discover that we were responsible for the ASF losing its stat= us > over an assumption we made. There was an e-mail from Simone Tripodi to the Board mailing list (11.01.20= 11). Shane Cucuru responded and it was very clear to me that projects are free to use the social media they want. We just need to take care on the branding, be able to let other PMC members access these tools and to make clear, if the channel does speak on the projects behalf or not. Maybe I don't get the issue right, but imho this whole discussion is just about one question: can we link to our Twitter/Facebook/G+ channel or not. And given the fact we are allowed to use these tools, why should we not be allowed to link to them? Cheers Christian > -- > Martin Cooper > > > - Ren=C3=A9 >> >> > -- >> > Martin Cooper >> > >> > >> > [...] >> >> -- >> Ren=C3=A9 Gielen >> http://twitter.com/rgielen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org >> >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org