struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Raible <m...@raibledesigns.com>
Subject Re: Plan for Struts 3
Date Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:59:51 GMT
If it breaks backwards-compatibility, I'd suggest not doing it. I've always been impressed
with projects like Spring that've maintained backwards compatibility w/o making a breaking
change such as this.

On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Jeff Black <jeffrey.black@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Never mind.
> 
> I suppose it makes sense to some extent; however I'm with Dave when it comes to incorporating
the version number in the package name.
> 
> Just my two cents.
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Jeff Black <jeffrey.black@yahoo.com>
> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3
> 
> Is it really necessary to alter the package name?
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlenart@apache.org>
> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> 
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3
> 
> 2012/11/22 Dave Newton <davelnewton@gmail.com>:
>> How useful is the Struts 1 plugin?
> 
> It's mentioned as a migration way for S1 projects, but we can drop
> support for S1 in S3
> 
> 
> Regards
> -- 
> Ɓukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message