Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A96E976F1 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46992 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2011 10:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 46489 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2011 10:24:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 46481 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2011 10:24:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rene.gielen@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:24:22 +0000 Received: by faao14 with SMTP id o14so897969faa.35 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:24:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=o7fp5sc85ZiWpOToHyvfWjxA0YdTQGDmVXug0zw2R/Q=; b=LKZx9mH1Bau6tquymTK8TbFqG4XTZAC/IwtwWZONNEKGv4lyk0rrYn5a0lV+Ym1WuR Tt9EWff59w1SZm1+6+9O/z+eIJd71UZ3aFITGlC9qzkq0GCU4DaF7BNq423qRcrOj2x5 Q4cyqsdFPElOHI476+rXBoGCgndlU4bbx1cuc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.109.199 with SMTP id hu7mr31349194lab.16.1322562241875; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.25.4 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:24:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4E98AABE.30009@it-neering.net> <1318932191773-4913127.post@n5.nabble.com> <4E9D52F0.1050702@gmail.com> <4E9D5F20.8040201@gmail.com> <1318949976.26377.YahooMailNeo@web160518.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:24:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deprecate 2.1 version From: Rene Gielen To: Struts Developers List , lukasz.lenart@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54b4a529ecf8304b2dd047c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54b4a529ecf8304b2dd047c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable While I'm pretty sure that the discussion about branding vs. versioning hasn't come to any conclusion yet, I strongly disagree with the proposed versioning of at least four numbers, as I understand this here. I'd rather see it as 3.0.0 3.0.1 3.0.2 (Security problem detected) 3.0.2.1 (Fasttrack release) 3.0.3 ... 3.1.0 (Fabulous new features and all exciting stuff, but API stability) 3.1.1 ... The forth number is only for rare cases, usually each released version consists of three numbers. - Ren=C3=A9 2011/11/29 =C5=81ukasz Lenart > Struts 3 should be version as follow: > - 3.0.0.1 > - 3.0.1.1 > - 3.1.0.1 > - .... > > ? > > > Kind regards > -- > =C5=81ukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org > > --bcaec54b4a529ecf8304b2dd047c--