Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4DE3B857.8070002@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:31:35 +0200
From: Rene Gielen <rgielen@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace the current Portlet Plugin with Sandbox Version
References: <1306738079677-4438472.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <BANLkTik4Q4hbjBct3U9yeM6JvzSFY1TpXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik4Q4hbjBct3U9yeM6JvzSFY1TpXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Thanks Martin!

If there was one thing I had to name for what I've learned at ASF it
would surely be "you never stop learning" :)

Going to cancel this vote and make up a new one.

- Ren�

On 30.05.11 16:25, Martin Cooper wrote:
> It is very important to recognise that two different steps are
> required to accomplish what you want here.
> 
> 1) The promotion of anything out of the sandbox requires a vote. Thus,
> formally speaking, it is not possible to vote on the current topic,
> because we cannot include the sandbox version of the plugin in a
> release. The plugin must be promoted out of the sandbox before it can
> replace the current plugin.
> 
> 2) Once the sandbox plugin has been promoted such that it _could_
> become part of a release, there needs to be either consensus or a vote
> to include it as part of what we intend to release. Note that this
> does not _require_ a vote; consensus is sufficient. (Of course, a vote
> will be required later for the release itself, but that's just a
> normal release vote.)
> 
> This vote needs to be recast first as a vote to promote out of the
> sandbox. Once that is done and has passed, either a second vote can be
> started for replacing the existing plugin, if there might be
> contention, or - more likely in this case, I believe - a proposal /
> discussion thread can be started to ensure that there is consensus to
> do so.
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Johannes Geppert <jogep@apache.org> wrote:
>> The version in the Sandbax is based on JSR286 and except the Portlet event
>> handling feature complete.
>> The event feature is isolated and may be delivered later.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3620
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Johannes
>>
>> -----
>>
>> --------------
>> web: http://www.jgeppert.com
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://struts.1045723.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Replace-the-current-Portlet-Plugin-with-Sandbox-Version-tp4438472p4438472.html
>> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 

-- 
Ren� Gielen
http://twitter.com/rgielen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org