Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of musachy@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=lxSP0YKvXd5KQy/8yNRFWwQztJJaES1HA/pC2KCL2557veXA+tlc7B2nJ9SMLRKmVZ
         e8APRdhCo/fQHdAGSN9oDZ93cJ8Zj2yGqXB3vOtd/OVkqYXVZAG7ldjuCJeOuUuSGC1G
         ZiZjggZcF543LPA1UA1rsoY7obxInuhljn/Dg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <16d6c6201001061011y3fa93e9fl9c96928c9f7b6aaa@mail.gmail.com>
References: <16d6c6200912271025p74b4c2eeoeb87e20e60f3675b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e34c19110912281029x78170114x11e5843996888137@mail.gmail.com>
	 <16d6c6200912281057l4e102f6g9401a0f12a202333@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B3901C9.2050400@Newfield.org>
	 <b9e663070912281116x6c85b869r530cd91aa253cf7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <e34c19110912281137q29453d3ewbddd15b28e0020de@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b9e663070912281310w18f7dbe9m98a16d750086433@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9f960bad1001052337t2172f018k5a091a4e1f5acb1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <d8bdeb6f1001060927n28e5bb15sec71ebf70bf477c2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <16d6c6201001061011y3fa93e9fl9c96928c9f7b6aaa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:16:26 -0800
Message-ID: <d8bdeb6f1001061016x5161151dtb9e98b04fcdcc847@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: XWork has landed!
From: Musachy Barroso <musachy@gmail.com>
To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

hum, that's what i understood mot people wanted from our original
discussion and the last time we talked about this. It keeps xwork
independent (well sort of) and it will be part of the same release
process.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Martin Cooper <martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Musachy Barroso <musachy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think the agreement is to move it under the struts trunk and make it
>> a maven module, like core.
>
> Really? I haven't seen much discussion since I posted what I believe
> is the set of alternatives that we need to choose from. I saw quite a
> few different opinions expressed, almost all in different terms (which
> is why I posted what I did), but I'm not sure I saw a consensus
> emerge.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Lukasz Lenart
>> <lukasz.lenart@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/12/28 Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org>:
>>>> My fault for not being clear. I was intending to say XWork should be a
>>>> "child module" (in the Maven sense) so it's actually part of Struts2
>>>> build and versioning process.
>>>
>>> Any news? I would like to start some refactoring in Xwork and it will
>>> be nice to know where we are ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Lukasz
>>> http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>>> http://javarsovia.pl
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org