Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8369 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2009 21:07:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2009 21:07:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 86140 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2009 21:07:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 86057 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2009 21:07:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 86046 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2009 21:07:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:07:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lukasz.lenart@googlemail.com designates 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.171] (HELO mail-vw0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:07:46 +0000 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so690307vws.23 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:07:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WFYuRYGEiqODigKLvwOZ9jrsQCL+1AtCrm6lN1NNNZo=; b=vyj8AExMt6n/bQiHrs8sGVKzRn57Ua5en99J6mjAAXyTyeQnBLAa5Hxiv32gCzG3LF gbbyJ6HGO3IlkEynpjn9BgZAj0Nkgh1E8273UuL7cvqIC6PqjgJyZM835xItqtlnKUay ZCoMKknDIDXrJpbySG4c1UtqhOhzqW7SL7bVY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Xi6mfHviC0ctp3evqxGYvYUqbURdXlv+Ih0wVgFzBq0a+EM4JiBeK3jkdCPJNevEn0 1zVTSC2CqFyvXC6fsiSIULSBXSsUXex0bCYzwrerlc1cqoO+T6NYMu2krUpQfHI4WsM6 wldX4OwWTfkSNsBKv/F62ZDRZtQm9yx6muQBE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.122.73 with SMTP id k9mr1376108vcr.84.1261084045697; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:07:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <16d6c6200912160947k2d1a921dhec0bbd50464dc89d@mail.gmail.com> <9f960bad0912160950x3f2bd67em59a0acba3cd391d9@mail.gmail.com> <9f960bad0912171243i42882f1dy4fe83c886c92eeff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:07:25 +0100 Message-ID: <9f960bad0912171307u7b3de2afy2279dc5d0d804f28@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Version number ordering From: Lukasz Lenart To: Struts Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2009/12/17 Wes Wannemacher : > If no one responds, I will probably update the docs so that we take > the default. But, if an artifact is already released, we should > probably leave it as-is, since the released pom > (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/tags/struts2-archetype-starter-2.1.8.1/pom.xml) > has a link to the tag you created. I thing we/I should stick with the current tag naming convention as the core project is following it. Right now we have only mess with tags for archetypes ;-) Regards -- Lukasz http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org