struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Version number ordering
Date Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:05:13 GMT
I am +1 for using the default that maven suggest. Less to remember and document.

musachy

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Lukasz Lenart
<lukasz.lenart@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/12/17 Wes Wannemacher <wesw@wantii.com>:
>> If no one responds, I will probably update the docs so that we take
>> the default. But, if an artifact is already released, we should
>> probably leave it as-is, since the released pom
>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/maven/tags/struts2-archetype-starter-2.1.8.1/pom.xml)
>> has a link to the tag you created.
>
> I thing we/I should stick with the current tag naming convention as
> the core project is following it. Right now we have only mess with
> tags for archetypes ;-)
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Lukasz
> http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message