struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: struts 2.2 and guice
Date Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:59:38 GMT
good point Brian, that has came up also. I have a couple of concerns
about it, like what is the status of the jsr and will the API
(annotations) will be under a decent (read ASF compatible license)
license and in maven central? which is usually a pain point when it
comes to Sun APIs.

musachy

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Brian Pontarelli <brian@pontarelli.com> wrote:
> I'd suggest using Guice trunk and the JSR annotations rather than the Guice annotations.
I'd also make the injector pluggable so that people can plug in Spring/Guice/etc easily.
>
> -bp
>
>
> On Dec 1, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
>> I have talked to a couple of people before and everyone seems to agree
>> that using guice instead of our internal IoC container (guice pre 1.0
>> I think), would be a good idea. I don't have any experience with guice
>> 2.0, but looking at the docs it seems like porting our stuff would not
>> be that hard. Less code to maintain, and we get more
>> features/improvements. If we go with this idea, guice would be shaded
>> into xwork to avoid classpath conflicts.
>>
>> what do you think?
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message