Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22745 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2009 16:56:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2009 16:56:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 84312 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 84246 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2009 16:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 84236 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2009 16:56:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:56:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antonio.petrelli@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.226 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.226] (HELO mail-bw0-f226.google.com) (209.85.218.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:56:03 +0000 Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so7861260bwz.27 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:55:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UagAkzbZ5SCaZwOJrHdO8V755Z6xQSZmV8zsf59Z7NM=; b=lfJrEJ+ieEiwUSW3QFLXwAssDSYwJ4V8pw4O5erj3SV+kAVYlXiWpp0Up1bxEIh5Dg T2RbIchu06eQ0gk/jW35/5M/lhggpnO8B1Hj134pG7wqq5u3W051Maup+W3JJIgOuPwA C6WRHeL4y44fVOvRDJNDVzx1KqfwV7g9sGTG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wwlNkGt97zIMr5qd9yhNyg1bbjEBQ+l/q59c8iiS5WttnSCuJ4Dmd52xhL5dMb2LAG aGszvBwJT6MJACeW63OSFaL9L4TYecXVEyHHcO0B1jqn8RRDr9v4i4LxuQFr7aq//GgQ seg2ttY8dqCU0hjwKILhf8n4DOisYOsdqo5KA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.36.206 with SMTP id u14mr201699bkd.138.1257267342602; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:55:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <42db7f0a0911021814n77896eeet32efc7e1f8a473ab@mail.gmail.com> <42db7f0a0911021920q5b54e29cr815374ad52e6a7e6@mail.gmail.com> <42db7f0a0911022042h641eb70dn96c518edcbf6502b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:55:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance From: Antonio Petrelli To: Struts Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2009/11/3 Antonio Petrelli : > 2009/11/3 Musachy Barroso : >> We also have FreeMarker , Velocity and we have a lot of expression >> evaluations from Struts code itself. > > And in this case you're right, EL at Struts-side is obligatory. > But exactly, is a bad idea to use the capability of the container to > resolve EL expressions into values? > This is just an idea. Another thing, sorry for the noise :-D If EL Expressions are interpreted Struts-side, this means that in JSP tags the attributes that represent expressions should not be "rtexpr" activated. This means that they might not have an expression, so you cannot write: because it is not interpreted as a string, but as an expression illegally placed. So you should do funny things, like string composition, to let it work. Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org