struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>
Subject Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)
Date Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:24:06 GMT
Except the API changes. Remember that any API change that breaks  
someone should be a major release. That's why people work so hard on  
keeping old APIs around.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 12, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul Benedict<pbenedict@apache.org>  
> wrote:
>> I definitely agree that Struts 3 would be a good candidate to do  
>> this XWork
>> migration. It is not an appropriate candidate for 2.1, or 2.2.  
>> However, if
>> you like to do a 2.5 (I dislike superficial jumps in versions  
>> though), then
>> it might be acceptable in the 2.x branch.
>
> IMO "Struts 3" would imply a major change in Struts itself, the
> possibility of backwards incompatible changes, etc.  This isn't...
> community aspects aside, it's just moving some code from one svn repo
> to another.  -Wendy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message