struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Pyeron" <jpye...@pdinc.us>
Subject RE: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)
Date Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:00:44 GMT
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musachy@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:45
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?)
> 
> Have we reached any kind of consensus about bringing xwork 
> in? If we are going to release a new major version could be 
> another discussion.


(Assumption: waiting on release because patches made to trunk not yet included
into released jar....)

Why can we use their trunk or snapshots?

If we fork we are essentially loosing their QA process anyway...

My .02$

> 
> musachy
> 
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Brian 
> Pontarelli<brian@pontarelli.com> wrote:
> > Why so hesitant to do another release? It has been a long 
> time since 
> > 2.0. I think it is time for some major rework and releasing 
> a new major version.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Aug 12, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Don Brown <mrdon@twdata.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Paul 
> Benedict<pbenedict@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are you sure it's not an incompatible change? I thought the 
> >>> discussion was the importing of XWork and getting rid of its 
> >>> branding. That means all of XWork's annotations and 
> packages would 
> >>> be changed to org.apache.struts. I don't believe there is 
> any desire 
> >>> to keep com.opensymphony when this occurs.
> >>> So my thinking would be this would be an incompatible 
> change. Did I 
> >>> get it wrong?
> >>
> >> I think completely removing any trace of xwork is a good long term 
> >> 3.0 goal, but for now, we would simply fork it, keeping 
> the package 
> >> structure and class names.
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Wendy Smoak 
> <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul 
> >>>> Benedict<pbenedict@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I definitely agree that Struts 3 would be a good 
> candidate to do 
> >>>>> this
> >>>>
> >>>> XWork
> >>>>>
> >>>>> migration. It is not an appropriate candidate for 2.1, or 2.2. 
> >>>>> However,
> >>>>
> >>>> if
> >>>>>
> >>>>> you like to do a 2.5 (I dislike superficial jumps in versions 
> >>>>> though),
> >>>>
> >>>> then
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it might be acceptable in the 2.x branch.
> >>>>
> >>>> IMO "Struts 3" would imply a major change in Struts itself, the 
> >>>> possibility of backwards incompatible changes, etc.  
> This isn't...
> >>>> community aspects aside, it's just moving some code from one svn 
> >>>> repo to another.  -Wendy
> >>>>
> >>>> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For 
> >>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For 
> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For 
> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For 
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> 



--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-                                                               -
- Jason Pyeron                      PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant              10 West 24th Street #100    -
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333            Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-                                                               -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message