struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance
Date Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:57:08 GMT
I am done with the changes in xwork. Whoever can give a hand testing
what is in trunk, this is a good time to jump in :). If everything is
ok, we can release xwork and then do the 2.1.8 release.

musachy

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Musachy Barroso<musachy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Due to this fix: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-141
>
> Ognl 2.7.3 performance is a lot better than 2.6.11, on my rough test,
> the avg time spent in OgnlRuntime.invokeMethod(...) dropped from
> 630,726 ms (2.6.11) to 117,108 (2.7.3) ms, (100 threads, 2s ramp-up
> period, 100 iterations) . If we are not going to use the new bycode
> stuff, then the upgrade doesn't seem that risky. Should we upgrade, do
> some testing, and release 2.1.8 (delay release a bit), or leave that
> for 2.1.9? With the bytecode stuff out the way I am inclined to just
> upgrade to 2.7.3 at once, and upgrade freemarker also.
>
> musachy
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>



-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message