struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: confused about OGNL
Date Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:14:00 GMT
2.7 has been out for a while, so it should not be *that* risky, but I
wouldn't include it in 2.1.8 with such a short notice and no testing.

musachy

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Dale Newfield<dale@newfield.org> wrote:
> Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>
>> I did some more checking and it looks good. I would say after 2.1.8
>> gets released, we create the 2.1 branch and start working on 2.2,
>> which would use OGNL 2.7, how does that sound?
>
> I'm gonna start using 2.7(.3) now.  I think I had reverted from 2.7 to 2.6
> as a result of this exchange:
> http://www.nabble.com/Slow-performance-with-Struts2-td18092204.html .
>
> I thought we were already updating lots of other dependencies for 2.1.8?
>
> I understand that there might be code changes in struts that would allow us
> to benefit from some of the speedups in 2.7 (which would best go into 2.2),
> but if it neither breaks anything nor slows anything down with just a jar
> change, any reason to wait?  (Your caching issue is one, but adding that
> doNotCache flag seems like a reasonable workaround for now...)
>
> -Dale
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>



-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message