Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mfncooper@gmail.com designates
 209.85.221.122 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=GfD/bgMhJvQBUwiAdVv5h5vAl4Y9eRglvh4LKdQSLMPCbDcGdmdTXmU8f9a39QtmO7
         sMweCEwDd/xlesp3wR0p5AKaITO/4wqed95OCahIoLLFxBR2z9iuJNIFHPLj8FVo2AM8
         QsI9IDvocMSy1V5B3AdrLn5va+dbhcEQZ4U6Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mfncooper@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <200904261953.40027.wesw@wantii.com>
References: <200904261500.57265.wesw@wantii.com>
	 <200904261927.33448.wesw@wantii.com>
	 <16d6c6200904261647w4d9e6879u8208031d16bb8f09@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200904261953.40027.wesw@wantii.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:19:20 -0700
Message-ID: <16d6c6200904261719r7f5e7beagf9e995a61db9f842@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: struts-master pom release
From: Martin Cooper <martinc@apache.org>
To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cdb0c3bbb7d04687e4c05

--0015175cdb0c3bbb7d04687e4c05
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Wes Wannemacher <wesw@wantii.com> wrote:

> On Sunday 26 April 2009 07:47:25 pm Martin Cooper wrote:
> >
> > There's no requirement to serialise votes and releases the way you
> describe
> > above. In fact, as Wendy pointed out before, we could actually run the
> > votes concurrently. I'd say there's very little chance that the POM vote
> > would fail, so there would be little risk to that approach.
> >
> > Also, even if we went ahead and released the POM now, we could still
> > release it again immediately after Lukasz's account is set up. No need to
> > wait until we're close to another release.
> >
> > I'm not advocating any particular approach here - just clarifying the
> > options.
> >
>
> I didn't realize we could run them concurrently...
>
> I originally planned to do the build/release tomorrow. I'll just plan to do
> them both then, if he's in, great, otherwise, we'll run a release of
> struts-
> master when he's in. I can put him in the pom.xml before running the
> release,
> I can't find the email where he indicated his choices for username. If
> someone
> can forward me what his first choice was, I don't think there are any
> lukasz's
> on apache namespace, so I'm thinking his first choice will go through.
>
> -Wes
>
> PS - HAHAHAHA! Just before I hit send, the NOTICE email came through...


Yup. I've taken care of the Struts-related bits, so he's good to go.

--
Martin Cooper


>
> --
>
> Wes Wannemacher
> Author - Struts 2 In Practice
> Includes coverage of Struts 2.1, Spring, JPA, JQuery, Sitemesh and more
> http://www.manning.com/wannemacher
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>

--0015175cdb0c3bbb7d04687e4c05--