Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50550 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2008 21:45:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Nov 2008 21:45:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 49691 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2008 21:45:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 49634 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2008 21:45:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 49623 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2008 21:45:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:45:18 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [85.214.44.140] (HELO e.nrgie.net) (85.214.44.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:43:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.66] (p508A3E16.dip.t-dialin.net [80.138.62.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by e.nrgie.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2E4EFCBA8 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:46:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4920943A.3080105@it-neering.net> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:44:26 +0100 From: Rene Gielen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Drop J4 support, was: Re: release process References: <586967.45389.qm@web111514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <64455.91.57.209.44.1226860549.squirrel@aixcept.de> In-Reply-To: <64455.91.57.209.44.1226860549.squirrel@aixcept.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 for dropping in 2.1, along with keeping it in 2.0.X Rainer Hermanns schrieb: > I'd vote with +1 for dropping j4-support in Struts 2.1.X > but with -1 for Struts 2.0.X because of known users using > previous 2.0.X backported releases and that are waiting for > another stable GA release for their production systems. > > just my 0.02€, > cheers, > Rainer > >> Yes, my thoughts were on that direction, drop out direct support and >> document what needs to be done, for those that still need it. >> >> musachy >> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Dave Newton >> wrote: >> >>> --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Musachy Barroso wrote: >>>> I know someone already asked this but, shouldn't we drop >>>> the jdk4 support already? >>> +1, but I'll add a wiki page giving a brief overview of the retro >>> process >>> ("Run this batch file, loser!") >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org