Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <92544c510807080556v587a1694s1382aaf638e5c1ec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:56:02 -0400
From: "James Holmes" <james@jamesholmes.com>
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track) - UPDATE / SERIOUS
 ISSUE
In-Reply-To: <59394.80.87.162.65.1215508919.squirrel@webmail.nrgie.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_26724_8282203.1215521762251"
References: <485F504B.1050705@apache.org> <4869394E.9010201@it-neering.net>
	 <4872AFD1.4030400@it-neering.net>
	 <436d9a250807071739w2404cd7xb5179c49a2a5c9ae@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49459.217.235.199.252.1215503632.squirrel@aixcept.de>
	 <59394.80.87.162.65.1215508919.squirrel@webmail.nrgie.net>

------=_Part_26724_8282203.1215521762251
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

+1 sounds like a good plan to me.

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Rene Gielen <gielen@it-neering.net> wrote:

> Rainer, if you could release XW 2.0.6, then the Websphere guys should be
> able to manually fix their deployments until a 2.0.12 is out. 2.0.11.2
> still fixes the security issue and could be officially announced, with a
> remark on the Websphere issue.
>
> For 2.0.12 in addition to upgrading freemarker, I would like to backport a
> couple of important bugfixes reported for 2.0.x but only fixed for trunk
> during this week. A possible timeline could be to push out a 2.0.12 beta
> on Sunday so that the best case for the vote to pass is middle of next
> week, resulting in a release by the end of next week.
>
> Am Di, 8.07.2008, 09:53, schrieb Rainer Hermanns:
>  > Rene, I could release xwork 2.0.6 either today or tomorrow.
> > 2.0.11.3 sounds good to me as well, but why not release
> > 2.0.12 with some additional patches, like the freemarker
> > lib update.
> > Since it took that long to get out the fast track release,
> > another 3 days for voting wouldn't be an issue for me...
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > cheers,
> > Rainer
> >
> >> 2.0.11.3 sounds fine to me.  Are there that many commits on the 2.0.x
> >> branch that we aren't ready to release?
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Rene Gielen <gielen@it-neering.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Some might have noticed that there was still no official announcement
> >>> for 2.0.11.2 availability. Until Saturday, there was an issue with the
> >>> gpg signature of the maven artifacts [1], which needed a pom fix [2]
> >>> and
> >>> a redeployment of the files to sync with the official maven
> >>> repositories. Since Saturday, correctly signed artifacts should be
> >>> distributed.
> >>>
> >>> Just before I wanted to get the announcement out on Sunday, a possibly
> >>> blocking issue for 2.0.11.2 users under Websphere 6 was reported [3].
> >>> It
> >>> turned out that the issue was already known and fixed for Struts 2.1.x
> >>> /
> >>> XWork 2.1.x, but the critical patch already applied in XWork2 trunk was
> >>> not in the 2.0 branch, causing 2.0.5 to break in a Websphere
> >>> environment. The fix is applied now [4], but it looks like this is to
> >>> late for the 2.0.11.2 release.
> >>>
> >>> The cleanest solution is to release a XWork 2.0.6 including the fix,
> >>> and
> >>> a Struts 2.0.12.3 release still under fast track conditions. Do we
> have
> >>> better / faster options? Comments highly appreciated...
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/repo/
> >>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/repo/faq.html
> >>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2709
> >>> [4] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-651
> >>>
> >>> Rene Gielen schrieb:
> >>>> +1 GA binding
> >>>>
> >>>>  * Rene Gielen
> >>>>  * Rainer Hermanns
> >>>>  * Musachy Barroso
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 GA supporting
> >>>>
> >>>>  * Dave Newton
> >>>>
> >>>> Struts 2.0.11.2 is now rated at GA, and I proceeded to copying the
> >>>> files for mirroring. After veryfing, I'll post the announcement.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Rene
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rainer Hermanns
> > aixcept
> > Mariahilfstrasse 9
> > 52062 Aachen - Germany
> > w: http://aixcept.de/
> > t: +49-241-4012247
> > m: +49-170-3432912
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rene Gielen  | http://it-neering.net/
> Aachen       | PGP-ID: BECB785A
> Germany      | gielen at it-neering.net
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>

------=_Part_26724_8282203.1215521762251--