Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <436d9a250807071739w2404cd7xb5179c49a2a5c9ae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:39:47 +1000
From: "Don Brown" <mrdon@twdata.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.0.11.2 Quality (fast track) - UPDATE / SERIOUS
 ISSUE
In-Reply-To: <4872AFD1.4030400@it-neering.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <485F504B.1050705@apache.org> <4869394E.9010201@it-neering.net>
	 <4872AFD1.4030400@it-neering.net>

2.0.11.3 sounds fine to me.  Are there that many commits on the 2.0.x
branch that we aren't ready to release?

Don

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Rene Gielen <gielen@it-neering.net> wrote:
> Some might have noticed that there was still no official announcement
> for 2.0.11.2 availability. Until Saturday, there was an issue with the
> gpg signature of the maven artifacts [1], which needed a pom fix [2] and
> a redeployment of the files to sync with the official maven
> repositories. Since Saturday, correctly signed artifacts should be
> distributed.
>
> Just before I wanted to get the announcement out on Sunday, a possibly
> blocking issue for 2.0.11.2 users under Websphere 6 was reported [3]. It
> turned out that the issue was already known and fixed for Struts 2.1.x /
> XWork 2.1.x, but the critical patch already applied in XWork2 trunk was
> not in the 2.0 branch, causing 2.0.5 to break in a Websphere
> environment. The fix is applied now [4], but it looks like this is to
> late for the 2.0.11.2 release.
>
> The cleanest solution is to release a XWork 2.0.6 including the fix, and
> a Struts 2.0.12.3 release still under fast track conditions. Do we have
> better / faster options? Comments highly appreciated...
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/repo/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~henkp/repo/faq.html
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2709
> [4] http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-651
>
> Rene Gielen schrieb:
>> +1 GA binding
>>
>>  * Rene Gielen
>>  * Rainer Hermanns
>>  * Musachy Barroso
>>
>> +1 GA supporting
>>
>>  * Dave Newton
>>
>> Struts 2.0.11.2 is now rated at GA, and I proceeded to copying the
>> files for mirroring. After veryfing, I'll post the announcement.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rene
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org