struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Musachy Barroso" <musa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Bring Convention plugin into trunk and deprecate Zero Config
Date Sat, 17 May 2008 04:41:03 GMT
> What I meant is that with some effort, instead of the convention plugin
> providing both Configuration and Mapping/Invocation is could be split into
> two: a plugin that provides config via annotation and a plugin that provides
> mapping & invocation conventions.  If that were the case then developers
> could separately chose the configuration approach (annotation or xml) and
> the mapping and invocation approach (plain or restful).  It was just an
> idea.
>

I am still thinking about this one, the advantages of splitting the
automagic action mapping based on default from the annotations is not
really clear to me yet.

> (And yes, with the right settings, REST can invoke actions defined in XML
> config when they have the appropriate methods as all action/controller
> definitions come from same Configuration instance).

In that case then REST should continue to be in it's own plugin. I
don't know where Paul gets those ideas :).

musachy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message