Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94299 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2008 14:18:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2008 14:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 93414 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2008 14:18:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 93357 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2008 14:18:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 93346 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2008 14:18:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:18:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.196.97.73] (HELO web56714.mail.re3.yahoo.com) (66.196.97.73) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:18:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 35021 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2008 14:18:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=tEqaEMIUiCBXTxV/qR5swmx0bUadcyFRpj4BhKDrIHn1ldJm0Y7J0UCsPHlSJnjsiU+m4qs2vvBi1l1DkMSHsjLSmaQWSIv9QgiKcd1ijxezl39yOgPGGCrO66Q05YXGhaKlxde2spcIcBmQhRgaDl93fIFhDhwVKOs727hNpFs=; X-YMail-OSG: 6AZL3o8VM1lUY4TreBfUrWJdZTsMVIf6sXYUtZT7dB3_657buDm1vUkL9eYoqSz25_XBKv2VC3Mvob95S.GLWalXo05GsZL.PeXi6Ui2kYg4bzz9or0Pglox_C7RP2tQj6SAyY9aNsR.6Q-- Received: from [68.39.7.164] by web56714.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:18:22 PDT Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 07:18:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave Newton Subject: Re: Dojo plugin update using 1.1.0 framework To: Struts Developers List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <529986.33109.qm@web56714.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --- Al Sutton wrote: > My main driver for doing the updates was to update the S2.1 code to bring > it inline with the latest version, but perhaps we should put our hands up and > admit that S2's focus is not on Ajax UI widgets Nobody has yet provided any information as to the potential cost of making Dojo 1.0 work and nobody answered my question regarding what level of functionality currently exists in the Dojo 1.0 plugin, so I'm pretty much unable to come to any cogent conclusion. If it came to a vote I'd probably say (a) leave the current Dojo plugin where it is, and (b) put any new tag plugins on Google Code (like my semi-dormant jQuery plugin and others people are working on). I don't know what the ASF policy is on "endorsing" particular code, but it seems like if a new plugin got to the point of being usable it would be simple enough to add a "we currently recommend using..." or "among the better tag libraries are..." or whatever. Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org