Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36862 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2007 14:06:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2007 14:06:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 58912 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2007 14:05:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 58558 invoked by uid 500); 6 Sep 2007 14:05:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 58547 invoked by uid 99); 6 Sep 2007 14:05:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:05:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of antonio.petrelli@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.240 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.240] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.240) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:05:54 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c37so28962anc for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:05:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=YVYJWvgqDukpi1JUCBd9e4z0DLzWhlSoWJydE/VEa9U=; b=hgbhybDa8Mjz9f5S5hMe2SrNdjQ2nKB2SYf6UO+1bcRM0Kl9AlZroCkA1WzHU4dTFI+MrNQAELaQCUciGVAsowubgCmVTx7opKN/Cy9igvWokrZBM1AmX9JLrhPOe3AMj9eOXfdaulAXEMl7Igu+566Y6OgmUnBArUGYhvJyJ9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Dutdkn7IyEQblHI2Wnpon3P8N1Dg48IsAE1guoYSDC2rnwrxZBm4qVlE9RqUFbavfFG5RqAuTDqo0DwdyPTfsrytIB7vdR4YfEtt9wo6XTmGWfMaTr2BcSsyw48LbEZ6175T/K+pGHmMpAhZsrxORdnE9Y9HCt67CKIfl75yveo= Received: by 10.100.167.7 with SMTP id p7mr535848ane.1189087533351; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.67.6 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:05:33 +0200 From: "Antonio Petrelli" To: "Struts Developers List" Subject: Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_48888_15045864.1189087533173" References: <8b3ce3790709060642h50625184x7dc0e7db10b18d35@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_48888_15045864.1189087533173 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2007/9/6, Rahul Akolkar : > > One of the reasons to generate is to > try to best guess the UID of a previous (serialization compatible) > version that didn't specify the UID. In fact, in JasperReports the UID contains the version number, something like: 20101 (for 2.1.1) Antonio ------=_Part_48888_15045864.1189087533173--