Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57031 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2007 09:20:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2007 09:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 93968 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 09:20:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 93931 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2007 09:20:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 93920 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2007 09:20:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:20:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:20:34 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c37so70487anc for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.166.14 with SMTP id o14mr2084081ane.1190280012300; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.41.19 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <436d9a250709200220q5785f522if91bfe9d4a11914d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:20:12 +1000 From: "Don Brown" To: "Struts Developers List" Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Should I announce SmartURLs or wait? In-Reply-To: <8b3ce3790709171453l396e78aew6ea9eb6718b563d5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46E59EEB.7070405@pontarelli.com> <436d9a250709101903g97c62a6n9e151ded7776433e@mail.gmail.com> <46E69F74.4070003@pontarelli.com> <436d9a250709111714i286e6e57k3146d39ceb0cc1a0@mail.gmail.com> <8b3ce3790709130756j4ba65ab7o56d092686edc9c38@mail.gmail.com> <7C8EB15E-2F07-462B-A213-E46FF8DD45FC@mac.com> <8b3ce3790709131442w4415ad39k9b8a304c7b729c4a@mail.gmail.com> <8b3ce3790709171453l396e78aew6ea9eb6718b563d5@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd prefer we give this more thought and keep it in the 2.1.x branch. I view patch releases as those that only provide bug fixes or minor stability features. Something like annotations, which will be used in client code, is really a public API feature and should be reserved for minor, at the least, feature releases. Don On 9/18/07, Ted Husted wrote: > I was just wondering if it would make any sense to at least add > SmartURL-type ActionName and ActionNames annotations to the 2.0.x > core, so as to finish what we started with the validation and result > annotations. We probably don't need to get into exception and > interceptor annotations for 2.0, but ActionNames would be nice. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org