struts-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Mitchell <jmitc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:12:06 GMT
If you didn't know, you can turn off warnings for just that  
particular item under preferences.


--
James Mitchell



On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Ted Husted wrote:

> So, for complicated reasons, I'm trying to use Eclipse more these  
> days.
>
> Something it likes to do is nag that "The serializable class
> $classname does not declare a static final serialVersionUID field of
> type long".
>
> Since the Actions are serializable, we get this alot :)
>
> A seemingly good explanation of the message is here:
>
>  * http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa? 
> threadID=581654&messageID=3501336
>
> Do we want to go ahead and add the field and silence the nag? Or just
> turn it off in our Eclipse IDEs? Or add the "@SupressWarnings"
> annotations? Otherwise, it's hard to tell if we've addressed any other
> warnings.
>
> If we were to add it and use the "quick fix", should we "add a default
> serial ID" or  "add generated serial ID"?
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


Mime
View raw message