Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of musachy@gmail.com designates
 209.85.198.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=uSxMvFZLsqmuwEP8QNPHigEyCuaS8VMwB/cXhTGHHSAMa5Vy0hoLNRgH8eGnvSL57l1dIORhokUqdArZm6S9xYcXBNJLU0VTIEn8Op+fa4ifR0LGCEgTkij8HjJd08HEN/SkMbxFj2ALvKZZy35uvdoEkm42kp9f/+iBU8i3Kqc=
Message-ID: <d8bdeb6f0708171820j3f3594e5mf27912126375fe19@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:20:02 -0400
From: "Musachy Barroso" <musachy@gmail.com>
To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Ajax Theme
In-Reply-To: <8b3ce3790708171207o2cd05d66xd92ee4a8619c19f5@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <46C32EF5.5050401@fdar.com>
	 <d8bdeb6f0708150953mb86291bnf9ac56a2ce22f82d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8b3ce3790708171207o2cd05d66xd92ee4a8619c19f5@mail.gmail.com>

On 2.1 ajax validation will be provided by Dojo by default, but other
libraries can be used easily, (with prototype example):

http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ajax-validation.html

musachy

On 8/17/07, Ted Husted <husted@apache.org> wrote:
> I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but I've beent
> taking "The ajax validation depends on DWR" to mean that we use DWR to
> call the usual server-side validators from client-side ajax code. Is
> that correct?
>
> Is the use of DWR changing from 2.0.x to 2.1.x?
>
> Does the YUI Ajax plugin support validation?
>
> Has anyone tried the YUI plugin against the head?
>
> (And just to make our question day complete:)
>
> Do we want to bundle the Dojo plugin with Struts 2.1.x, or do we want
> to consider moving it to a Google Code site (perhpas with YUI), while
> it is still "experimental":
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 8/15/07, Musachy Barroso <musachy@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The ajax validation depends on DWR
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On 8/15/07, Ian Roughley <ian@fdar.com> wrote:
> > > Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now?  If
> > > so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. from
> > > the web.xml and form.ftl).  I can open a ticket if this is the case.
> > >
> > > /Ian
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>


-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org