Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49394 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2007 00:10:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2007 00:10:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 25746 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2007 00:10:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-struts-dev-archive@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 25192 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2007 00:10:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@struts.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Struts Developers List" Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@struts.apache.org Received: (qmail 25181 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2007 00:10:40 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:10:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ted.husted@gmail.com designates 209.85.134.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.134.190] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:10:30 -0700 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so1166167mue for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:10:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=eFngTWJzvhzv5PrUQGbv3qfh679LCd4EClnK4LnDAkx9jzfB+hoSFcygsnhxgqJutAz2J1gxgcaZulL4+8M1v+SOh2UqnJmePAx/KZN9YcZgSVlRt439uXhIhd0OL2ZO4wGlzgbGsWyCEO1ouMzsRvKIy+samKCDCK5IWqQ0VAg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=EffYHFg+XmBoQbMMDvnmwWO5evgpT/iYmHBBPpfwLTywZluaLwNxnzGXV8W4IyDHoouyQiB3KM1Aoyem+8SSPbGFGLtNpWbISwmGNBhS9hzT6Ajy5kqYiph1ZvdvqPa5eSa/25ejTzoIhw3uiuej7SL7umNEliPTPQP4cDF/lvo= Received: by 10.82.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr4307469buc.1174090208987; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.174.16 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8b3ce3790703161710l19523b6cm918615983c5c5628@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:10:08 -0500 From: "Ted Husted" Sender: ted.husted@gmail.com To: "Struts Developers List" Subject: Re: [s2] Struts 2.0.7 Status In-Reply-To: <1c661f2f0703161538s958f7bj87911c158556c24e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8b3ce3790703161358ib15e232r48c8d6e287d56336@mail.gmail.com> <899144.41755.qm@web56710.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1c661f2f0703161538s958f7bj87911c158556c24e@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 065f367b12022215 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 3/16/07, Don Brown wrote: > In my opinion, you should avoid using custom interceptor stacks > whenever possible. That way, you can simplify your configuration and > make your application more consistent. If the mailreader always used > the default stack, the zero configuration conversion would be trivial. > > Of course, another equally valid style is to use custom interceptor > stacks on most every action/package, but it does make zero > configuration adoption more difficult. Then modify it so it can use a default stack. Or, apply https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1796 -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org